Archive for the ‘Theology’ Category

January 28, 2010 0

Barth on Historical Judgments

By Robert Minto in Books, History, Theology

I am now in possession of the unabridged version of Barth’s Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century. Incidentally, I read in the preface that he refused to write an introduction to the partial version that we have in the Dordt Library — he wrote that,
I cannot alter the fact that I see the whole affair [...]

Tags: , , , , , , ,

January 3, 2010 0

Theological Criticism of Films

By Robert Minto in Criticism, Film, Narrative, Rhetoric, Theology

What, exactly, does a theologian as theologian have to say about films? Or, really, about popular narrative altogether? There is a need to ask this question, because “theological criticism” is frequently attempted — not least by myself over the history of this blog, with varying success — but infrequently considered on its own, as a [...]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

December 27, 2009 1

Rahner on Theology and Progress

By Robert Minto in History, Progress, Theology

A while back, I posted about how each theologian needs to define theology in order to credibly proceed in his chosen science. In the ensuing comment-dialogue, it became apparent that back of my assertions lay a conception of two kinds of theology: frozen (or static) theology and progressive (or dynamic) theology. This conception seemed to [...]

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

December 17, 2009 8

Why We Should Ask “What Is Theology?”

By Robert Minto in Prospects, Strategy, Theology

One of the tasks of every theologian must be to determine the answer to this question. He or she knows the tradition in which they long to work—but the temptation will always be to regurgitate what previous theologians have written. The value of such regurgitations is purely rhetorical or commemorative, a maintaining of inherited knowledge. [...]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

November 20, 2009 0

Faith: Foundation or Target?

By Robert Minto in Faith, Mystery, Self-subversion, Theology

There is a malicious understanding of the life of faith. It goes something like this: to have faith is to believe in certain foundational ideas. The proper result of this belief is a logical and rigorous application of those ideas to all of life. And make no mistake (this understanding says)—all of life will be [...]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

September 5, 2009 0

Flavors of Inquiry

By Robert Minto in Appreciation, Books, Music, Philosophy, Theology

Is it disrespectful (or perhaps merely amateurish) to talk about why we enjoy certain kinds of inquiry? Or is it bad form these days to treat study, like meals, as a source of pleasure as well as a regimen or diet? I enjoy theology, philosophy, literature, and music. I also have certain overweaning impulses to [...]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 7, 2009 2

About Reading the Bible & Theories

By Robert Minto in Obligation, Scholarship, Scripture, Theology

Theology is a kind of theorizing.
Many people don’t realize this. For some, a document like the Westminster Confession of Faith would be demeaned if it were called a collection of theories. To be theoretical is to be ephemeral, debatable, even disprovable. But confessions are theoretical—ephemeral, debatable, disprovable—even much more generally accepted confessions, such as the [...]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,